Jump to section
- No Retaliation Statement
- Title IX
- Sexual Harassment Definition According to Title IX
- Confidentiality
- Midwestern University Definition of Consent
- Relationship to State Law and Other University Policies
- Reporting Sexual Harassment
- Grievance Procedures for Sexual Harassment
- Initiating an investigation of sexual harassment:
- Guidelines for Title IX Grievance Procedures
- Written Notice of Allegations
- Dismissal of a Complaint
- Investigation and Resolution of Conduct Matter
- Method of Resolution: Informal Process
- Method of Resolution: Formal Process
- Questioning the Parties and Witnesses:
- Procedures for the hearing officer or decisionmaker to evaluate questions:
- Refusal to respond to questions and inferences based on refusal to respond to questions:
- Procedures for a live hearing:
- Written Determination Requirements:
- Appeal Process:
- Recordkeeping in Conduct Matters:
- Procedures for Reporting a Sexual Assault on Campus
- Supportive Measures
- Sexual Harassment Education and Awareness
The University is committed to ensuring the safety and security of all its members. Sexual misconduct is a serious violation of the standards set by the University since it creates an atmosphere of distrust and inequality and will not be tolerated. Sexual misconduct includes sexual harassment, sexual abuse, sexual assault or rape, domestic violence, dating violence and stalking. These policies and procedures establish a protocol whereby those who believe they have been subjected to sexual harassment and/or sexual misconduct may obtain redress promptly and equitably. The formal Title IX grievance process set out below applies to allegations of sexual harassment as defined in 34 C.F.R. § 106.30 and within the jurisdiction of 34 C.F.R. § 106.44; other alleged misconduct may be addressed under the University's otherwise applicable policies and procedures. Nothing in this distinction limits the University's broader prohibition of sex discrimination or sexual misconduct under applicable law and University policy.
This policy applies to all members of the University community, regardless of position/status, race; color; religion; creed; national origin or ancestry; ethnicity; sex (including pregnancy); gender); marital status; age; disability; citizenship; past, current, or prospective service in the uniformed services; genetic information; or any other protected classes recognized by state or local laws, or any other characteristic protected under applicable federal, state, or local laws.
Any student found to be in violation of the Title IX sexual harassment policies shall be subject to disciplinary action, which may include, but is not limited to, disciplinary warning, disciplinary probation, suspension, or dismissal. Any action taken by the University does not preclude or limit other redress such as the University reporting to or working with law enforcement agencies.
Midwestern University is independent of actions taken by external law enforcement agencies. Nothing about this policy is intended to limit the independent acts of law enforcement agencies.
No Retaliation Statement
The University prohibits intimidation, threats, coercion, or discrimination against any individual for exercising rights under Title IX, making a report or formal complaint, testifying, assisting, or participating or refusing to participate in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing. Retaliation is prohibited regardless of the outcome. A determination that an individual knowingly made a materially false statement in bad faith may be addressed under the University's applicable conduct policies; a determination of nonresponsibility, standing alone, does not establish that a report or statement was knowingly false. See 34 C.F.R. § 106.71.
Title IX
Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972 prohibits sexual discrimination. Sexual harassment and sexual violence are considered forms of sexual discrimination and are therefore violations of Title IX.
The Title IX statute applies to persons in the United States with respect to education programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance.
Universities must respond when sexual harassment occurs in the University’s education program. Violations of the University Sexual Misconduct Policy must be reported to Dr. Shannon Sesterhenn, Dean of Students, the Title IX Coordinator for the Glendale Campus, or to Dr. Megan Dallianis, Dean of Students, the Title IX Coordinator for the Illinois Campus. Reports can also be reported to Dr. Shawn Tennant or
Ms. Julie High Horse Gregg for the AZ Campus or Ms. Lori Vozari for the IL Campus, who serve as Deputy Title IX Coordinators for those respective campuses. In addition, students can report perceived Title IX violations to the Student Counselors on either campus, who serve as a confidential resource to students (see “Confidentiality” section below for details). Any person may report sexual harassment to the Title IX Coordinator in person, by mail, telephone, or email, using the Coordinator's published contact information, or by any other means resulting in receipt of the report; the online reporting portal is an additional, not exclusive, option. A formal complaint may be filed in person, by mail, or by email using an appropriate physical or digital signature or other indication that the complainant is the filer. See 34 C.F.R. §§ 106.8(a), 106.30.
Sexual Harassment Definition According to Title IX
Sexual Harassment means conduct on the basis of sex that satisfies one or more of the following:
- Quid Pro Quo Harassment: An employee of the University conditioning the provision of an aid, benefit, or service of the University on an individual's participation in unwelcome sexual conduct;
- Hostile Environment Harassment: Unwelcome conduct determined by a reasonable person to be so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to the University's education program or activity; or
- Specific Offenses (Clery Act / VAWA Offenses): Any of the following specific acts:
- Sexual Assault: An offense classified as a forcible or nonforcible sex offense under the uniform crime reporting system of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. This includes rape, sodomy, sexual assault with an object, fondling, incest, and statutory rape.
- Dating Violence: Violence committed by a person who is or has been in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with the victim. The existence of such a relationship shall be determined based on a consideration of:
- The length of the relationship;
- The type of relationship; and
- The frequency of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship.
- Domestic Violence: Felony or misdemeanor crimes of violence committed by:
- A current or former spouse or intimate partner of the victim;
- A person with whom the victim shares a child in common;
- A person who is cohabitating with or has cohabitated with the victim as a spouse or intimate partner;
- A person similarly situated to a spouse of the victim under the domestic or family violence laws of the jurisdiction; or
- Any other person against an adult or youth victim who is protected from that person's acts under the domestic or family violence laws of the jurisdiction.
- Stalking: Engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to:
- Fear for their safety or the safety of others; or
- Suffer substantial emotional distress.
Confidentiality
Employees of the University, including Resident Assistants in Housing, are required to report incidents of sexual misconduct to the Title IX Coordinator. Campus counselors are not required to report incidents of sexual misconduct to the school in a way that identifies the student. Thus, the student Counselors can be approached in confidence or as confidential resources.
Midwestern University (Title IX Coordinator and Student Counselors) will take reasonable steps to protect the privacy of the parties and witnesses during its grievance procedures; however, Midwestern University cannot guarantee absolute anonymity or privacy where certain information is required to faithfully execute the grievance process. Midwestern University will, however, attempt to disclose the minimum necessary to faithfully execute the grievance process. These steps will not restrict the ability of the parties to obtain and present evidence, including by speaking to witnesses; consult with their family members, confidential resources, or advisors; or otherwise prepare for or participate in the grievance procedures. The parties cannot engage in retaliation, including against witnesses.
The University will consider requests for confidentiality and requests not to proceed with an investigation in light of its obligations under Title IX. The Title IX Coordinator may sign a formal complaint where appropriate, even if the complainant does not wish to file one; doing so does not make the Coordinator a complainant or party. The University will explain the limits of confidentiality and take reasonable measures to safeguard privacy without restricting a party's right to discuss the allegations or gather and present relevant evidence. See 34 C.F.R. §§ 106.30, 106.44 and 106.45(b)(5)(iii).
Midwestern University Definition of Consent
Consent is a freely given agreement to the act of sexual penetration or sexual conduct in question that may be withdrawn at any time. Lack of verbal or physical resistance or submission by the complainant resulting from the use of force or threat of force by the respondent shall not constitute consent. Silence is not consent. The absence of refusal is not consent. The manner of dress of the complainant at the time of the offense shall not constitute consent. A current dating relationship or past sexual relations does not imply consent. A person who initially consents to sexual penetration or sexual conduct is not deemed to have consented to any sexual penetration or sexual conduct that occurs after they withdraw consent during the course of that sexual penetration or sexual conduct. Consent to engage in sexual activity with one person does not extend to another person.
Consent can only be given by an individual that understands the nature of the activity. The following individuals cannot give consent:
- An individual who is impaired due to alcohol or drug ingestion.
- Sleeping or unconscious person.
- An individual under the age of 18 .
- An individual who is incapacitated due to a mental disability.
Relationship to State Law and Other University Policies
Midwestern University complies with applicable federal and state laws concerning sexual harassment, sexual violence, dating violence, domestic violence, and stalking. The definitions and grievance procedures applicable to formal complaints arising under Title IX are governed by this policy and applicable federal law.
Conduct that falls outside the scope of Title IX may nevertheless violate other University policies or applicable state law and may be addressed through the University's other disciplinary or grievance procedures.
Additional state-specific definitions, reporting requirements, rights, and protections applicable to the University's Arizona and Illinois campuses are addressed in the University's other sexual misconduct policies, campus-specific disclosures, and Annual Security Reports, as applicable. These include disclosures required under the Clery Act and Violence Against Women Act and the protections required under the Illinois Preventing Sexual Violence in Higher Education Act.
Nothing in this policy limits rights or protections independently afforded under applicable federal or state law.
Reporting Sexual Harassment
Reports of possible sexual harassment may be made to the Dean of Students serving as the campus Title IX Coordinator, including through www.midwestern.edu/just-report-it, or by the other means described herein. The Title IX Coordinator will conduct the initial assessment, coordinate supportive measures, and oversee a prompt, equitable grievance process when a formal Title IX complaint is filed. An impartial investigator will gather evidence; a separate, impartial decisionmaker will conduct the hearing and determine responsibility. Academic Deans or Human Resources may implement sanctions within their respective authority consistent with the decisionmaker's determination and the required simultaneous written notice to both parties. Students may also report possible crimes to external law enforcement. University and law-enforcement investigations may proceed independently and, where appropriate, concurrently. The University applies the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard to all formal Title IX sexual harassment complaints against students and employees, including faculty.
Investigations of student complaints that involve another student or students only will be undertaken as stated above.
Investigations involving a student and an employee may be coordinated jointly by the Title IX office and Human Resources, provided that the investigator, responsibility decisionmaker, and appellate decisionmaker remain appropriately independent and impartial. The Senior Vice President for Human Resources may implement disciplinary action against an employee consistent with the Title IX written determination and applicable employment procedures. Human Resources participation must not displace the formal Title IX grievance protections.
Student complaints concerning non-sexual harassment or other alleged violations of the Student Code of Conduct are governed under the Student Handbook’s section on the Student Judicial System.
Students determined responsible for sexual misconduct following the applicable University process may be found in violation of the University's 'Code of Responsibilities of the Students of Midwestern University,' as stated in The Code of the Responsibilities and Rights of Students section of this Handbook. Disciplinary sanctions may include, but are not limited to, a warning, probation, suspension, or dismissal. Alleged conduct may also be reported to or investigated by law enforcement under Illinois or Arizona law. Employees may be disciplined in accordance with applicable Human Resources policies after the required Title IX process, when applicable.
Employees charged with violations may also be prosecuted under Illinois or Arizona criminal statutes.
Grievance Procedures for Sexual Harassment
Midwestern University has adopted grievance procedures for the prompt and equitable resolution of formal complaints of sexual harassment as defined in 34 C.F.R. § 106.30. These procedures apply to formal Title IX complaints involving student or employee complainants or respondents, including faculty, within the jurisdiction of the 2020 Title IX regulations as recodified in 2026. Other sex-discrimination or sexual-misconduct complaints may be addressed under the University's other applicable procedures.
Initiating an investigation of sexual harassment:
A 'formal complaint' is a document filed by a complainant or signed by the Title IX Coordinator alleging sexual harassment against a respondent and requesting that the University investigate the allegation. A complainant may file by providing a physical or digital signature or otherwise indicating that the complainant is the person filing the complaint. See 34 C.F.R. § 106.30.
At the time of filing a formal complaint, a complainant must be participating in or attempting to participate in the education program or activity of Midwestern University.
For purposes of these procedures, the following principles apply to the identity and representation of the complainant:
- A 'complainant' is an individual alleged to be the victim of conduct that could constitute sexual harassment under Title IX; the individual need not be a student or employee in every case.
- A parent, guardian, or other legally authorized representative may exercise rights on behalf of a complainant to the extent permitted by law, but does not thereby become the complainant.
The Title IX Coordinator may also initiate a formal complaint by signing it, which triggers the formal grievance process even if the complainant chooses not to sign.
Midwestern University may consolidate formal complaints alleging sexual harassment against more than one respondent, by more than one complainant against one or more respondents, or by one party against another party when the allegations of sexual harassment arise out of the same facts or circumstances. References to a party, complainant, or respondent include the plural, as applicable.
To institute proceedings regarding allegations of sexual harassment, the following procedures shall be followed:
- Reports may be submitted to the campus Title IX Coordinator in person, by mail, telephone, or email using the published Title IX contact information, or through https://www.midwestern.edu/just-report-it. A report is not required to be submitted through the portal; formal complaints may be filed through any means authorized under 34 C.F.R. § 106.30.
- The University cannot facilitate an informal resolution process unless a formal complaint has been officially filed. At any time prior to reaching a final determination regarding responsibility, the University may offer the parties a voluntary informal resolution process (such as mediation), provided both the complainant and respondent give voluntary, written consent to participate. The University will not facilitate an informal resolution process to resolve allegations that an employee sexually harassed a student.
- A formal complaint must be filed by the complainant with an appropriate physical or digital signature or other indication of filing, or signed by the Title IX Coordinator, and must allege sexual harassment against a respondent and request an investigation. Upon receipt, the University will provide both known parties written notice that meets 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(2). The University will protect information as appropriate under applicable law, but will not impose a blanket confidentiality prohibition that prevents a party from discussing the allegations or gathering and presenting relevant evidence. Employee correspondence may be coordinated through Human Resources. If the alleged conduct would not constitute sexual harassment under 34 C.F.R. § 106.30 even if proved, did not occur within the University's education program or activity, or did not occur against a person in the United States, the University must dismiss that allegation for Title IX purposes, without preventing action under another applicable University policy.
- Emergency Removal: The University may remove a respondent from its education program or activity on an emergency basis only after an individualized safety and risk analysis determines that an immediate threat to the physical health or safety of a student or another individual arising from the alleged sexual harassment justifies removal. The respondent will receive notice and an opportunity to challenge the removal immediately following the removal. The University may place a non-student employee respondent on administrative leave during a pending grievance process, subject to applicable disability, employment, and other legal protections. See 34 C.F.R. § 106.44(c)-(d).
- Supportive Measures: The Title IX Coordinator is responsible for coordinating their effective implementation. These are non-disciplinary, non-punitive individualized services offered as appropriate, as reasonably available, and without fee or charge to the complainant or respondent before or after a formal complaint or when no formal complaint has been filed. Measures are designed to restore or preserve equal access to the University's education program or activity without unreasonably burdening the other party, to protect safety, or to deter sexual harassment. They may include counseling, schedule or rotation adjustments, housing changes, campus escorts, and mutual restrictions on contact. The University will maintain the confidentiality of supportive measures to the extent doing so does not impair implementation. Upon receiving actual knowledge of sexual harassment in its education program or activity against a person in the United States, the Title IX Coordinator will promptly contact the complainant to discuss available supportive measures, consider the complainant's wishes, explain their availability with or without a formal complaint, and explain the process for filing a formal complaint. See 34 C.F.R. §§ 106.30 and 106.44(a).
Guidelines for Title IX Grievance Procedures
Midwestern University will treat complainants and respondents equitably. Midwestern University requires that any Title IX Coordinator, investigator, or decisionmaker not have a conflict of interest or bias for or against complainants or respondents generally or an individual complainant or respondent. Under no circumstances may the decision-maker be the same individual as the Title IX Coordinator or the investigator assigned to the case. The same impartiality requirement applies to any person facilitating informal resolution. Title IX Coordinators, investigators, decisionmakers, and informal-resolution facilitators will receive the training required by 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(1)(iii), including relevant role-specific training on investigations, hearings, appeals, relevance, live-hearing technology, and avoidance of prejudgment, conflicts, bias, and sex stereotypes.
Grievance Timeframes and Extensions: The University will make every effort to resolve formal complaints within a reasonably prompt timeframe (typically 60 to 90 calendar days for the overall process). The parties may file an appeal within 10 business days after receiving the written determination or dismissal; the University ordinarily will resolve appeals within 30 calendar days after the appeal submission period closes and informal resolutions within 30 calendar days after consent, subject to complexity and the parties' availability. Temporary delays or limited extensions are permitted for good cause, including absence of a party, advisor, or witness; concurrent law-enforcement activity; or a need for disability accommodation or language assistance. The University will give both parties written notice of the delay or extension and the reasons for it. The mandatory evidence-review periods below will not be shortened.
Mandatory Evidence Review Windows: To ensure full due process, the following mandatory timelines apply to the investigation phase and cannot be shortened:
- 10-Day Preliminary Review: Prior to completion of the investigative report, the University will send to each party and their advisor all evidence directly related to the allegations. The parties must be granted at least 10 days to submit a written response, which the investigator will consider before finalizing the report.
- 10-Day Final Report Review: The investigator will send the finalized investigative report to each party and their advisor at least 10 days prior to a live hearing for their review and written response.
Midwestern University will take reasonable steps to protect the privacy of the parties and witnesses during its grievance procedures; however, Midwestern University cannot guarantee absolute anonymity or privacy where certain information is required to faithfully execute the grievance process. Midwestern University will, however, attempt to disclose the minimum necessary to faithfully execute the grievance process. These steps will not restrict the ability of the parties to obtain and present evidence, including by speaking to witnesses; consult with their family members, confidential resources, or advisors; or otherwise prepare for or participate in the grievance procedures. The parties cannot engage in retaliation, including against witnesses.
The investigator and decisionmaker will objectively evaluate all relevant evidence, including inculpatory and exculpatory evidence. Credibility determinations will not be based on a person's status as complainant, respondent, or witness. Evidentiary restrictions will be applied as provided in 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(1)(x), (b)(5)(i), and (b)(6)(i); those restrictions do not eliminate the parties' right to inspect evidence directly related to the allegations under § 106.45(b)(5)(vi).
The University will apply the following specific evidentiary limitations. These limitations will not be expanded to exclude otherwise directly related evidence merely because the University does not intend to rely on that evidence:
- Questions or evidence protected by a legally recognized privilege will not be required, allowed, relied upon, or otherwise used unless the person holding the privilege has waived it. A University designation of an employee as a confidential resource does not, by itself, establish a legally recognized privilege.
- The University will not access, consider, disclose, or otherwise use a party's treatment records made or maintained by a physician, psychiatrist, psychologist, or other recognized professional or paraprofessional acting in that capacity, or assisting in that capacity, unless it obtains that party's voluntary, written consent (or the legally required parent consent where applicable). See 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(5)(i).
- At a live hearing, questions and evidence concerning the complainant's sexual predisposition or prior sexual behavior are not relevant unless offered to prove that someone other than the respondent committed the alleged conduct, or unless they concern specific incidents of the complainant's prior sexual behavior with the respondent and are offered to prove consent. The existence of prior consensual sexual conduct does not, without more, establish consent to the conduct at issue. See 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(6)(i).
Written Notice of Allegations
Upon receipt of a formal Title IX complaint, and with sufficient time to prepare a response before any initial investigative interview, Midwestern University will provide the parties whose identities are known written notice that includes:
- Midwestern University’s Title IX grievance procedures, including the formal investigation process and any informal resolution process that is available;
- Notice of the allegations potentially constituting sexual harassment under 34 C.F.R. § 106.30, including the identities of the parties involved, if known; the conduct alleged; and the date and location of the alleged incident, if known;
- Retaliation is prohibited;
- A statement that the respondent is presumed not responsible for the alleged conduct until a determination is made at the conclusion of the grievance procedures.
- A statement informing the parties that they may have an advisor of their choice who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney;
- A statement informing the parties of their right to inspect and review any evidence obtained as part of the investigation that is directly related to the allegations, as well as the final investigative report;
- A statement explicitly informing the parties that the University’s Student Code of Conduct strictly prohibits knowingly making false statements or knowingly submitting false information during the grievance process.
If the University decides in the course of an investigation to investigate additional allegations about the complainant or respondent that were not included in the original written notice, including allegations in a consolidated complaint, the University will provide written notice of the additional allegations to the parties whose identities are known.
Dismissal of a Complaint
Midwestern University may dismiss a complaint if:
A. Mandatory Dismissal
The University must dismiss a formal complaint, or any allegations therein, for the purposes of Title IX sexual harassment if the Title IX Coordinator determines that the conduct alleged:
- Would not constitute sexual harassment as defined in this policy, even if proven;
- Did not occur within the University's education program or activity; or
- Did not occur against a person in the United States.
Note: A mandatory dismissal under Title IX does not preclude the University from investigating and adjudicating the allegations under the standard University Student Code of Conduct.
B. Discretionary Dismissal
The University may dismiss a formal complaint, or any allegations therein, at any time during the investigation or hearing if:
- The complainant notifies the Title IX Coordinator in writing that they wish to withdraw the formal complaint or any specific allegations;
- The respondent is no longer enrolled at or employed by the University; or
- Specific circumstances prevent the University from gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination as to the formal complaint or allegations therein.
C. Notice and Appeal of Dismissal
Upon any dismissal (mandatory or discretionary), the University will promptly send written notice of the dismissal and the specific reasons for the dismissal simultaneously to both parties. Either party may appeal a dismissal decision by following the procedures outlined in the Appeals section of this policy.
D. Provision of Support
Regardless of whether a complaint is dismissed from the formal Title IX process, the Title IX Coordinator will continue to offer and coordinate supportive measures for the complainant and respondent as appropriate.
Investigation and Resolution of Conduct Matter
Formal Title IX sexual harassment complaints involving students will be coordinated by the Title IX Coordinator, with investigation conducted by an impartial investigator and adjudication conducted by a separate, impartial decisionmaker. Non-Title IX student conduct matters will proceed under the applicable Student Judicial System procedures.
Midwestern University will provide for adequate, reliable, and impartial investigation of complaints.
The Title IX Coordinator and designated Deputy or Assistant Coordinators may receive reports and formal complaints and oversee the grievance process. An impartial investigator will gather evidence and prepare the investigative report. Following the investigation, the Title IX Coordinator will arrange for a live hearing before a designated, impartial decisionmaker who did not serve as Title IX Coordinator or investigator in the matter. The decisionmaker will determine responsibility and issue the written determination required by 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(7), including applicable sanctions or remedies. Academic Deans and Human Resources may administer sanctions within their respective authority consistently with that written determination.
In formal Title IX complaints involving employees, including those involving a student and employee, a qualified and impartial individual designated by the University may serve as decisionmaker. The Senior Vice President for Human Resources may serve in that role only if not also the Title IX Coordinator or investigator in the matter and without a conflict of interest, bias, or disqualifying prior participation. Human Resources may administer employment sanctions after the written determination. Complaints involving vendors will be evaluated for Title IX jurisdiction and addressed through applicable University procedures and contractual or other remedies as appropriate.
Method of Resolution: Informal Process
The University may facilitate an informal resolution process at any time prior to reaching a determination regarding responsibility, provided that:
- A Formal Complaint has been officially filed by the complainant or signed by the Title IX Coordinator;
- Both parties receive written notice identifying the allegations, the requirements of the informal resolution process, circumstances in which an agreed resolution would preclude resuming a formal complaint based on the same allegations, their right to withdraw before agreeing to a resolution, and any consequences of participating, including records that will be maintained or could be shared; and
- Both parties provide voluntary, written consent to participate in the informal process.
The University will not require a party to waive investigation and adjudication as a condition of enrollment, employment, or any other right, and will not require participation in informal resolution. Either party may withdraw from informal resolution and resume the formal process at any time before agreeing to a resolution. Informal resolution will not be offered or facilitated for allegations that an employee sexually harassed a student. Any mutually agreed resolution will be documented consistently with the written disclosures and applicable law; otherwise, potential discipline will be considered only through the formal process.
Both parties are also counseled that retaliatory behaviors are not condoned and that such behaviors would be subject to disciplinary actions in accordance with the Complaint/Grievance Policy set forth in the Student Judicial System section of the Student Handbook.
Method of Resolution: Formal Process
If a formal complaint is filed and informal resolution is not appropriate or is not chosen, the Title IX Coordinator will initiate the formal investigation and the required live hearing. Both the complainant and respondent may be accompanied by an advisor of choice during all relevant meetings, interviews, and proceedings, including an attorney. If a party has no advisor at the live hearing, the University will provide an advisor without fee or charge to conduct cross-examination.
- Midwestern University will not limit the choice or presence of the advisor for the complainant or respondent in any meeting or proceeding.
- Midwestern University may establish restrictions regarding the extent to which the advisor may participate in these grievance procedures, outside of cross-examination during a live hearing, as long as the restrictions apply equally to the parties.
The burden of proof and the burden of gathering sufficient evidence to determine responsibility is on Midwestern University—not on the parties.
Midwestern University will provide to a party whose participation is invited or expected, written notice of the date, time, location, participants, and purpose of all meetings or proceedings with sufficient time for the party to prepare to participate.
Midwestern University will provide each party an equal opportunity to present witnesses, including fact and expert witnesses, and other inculpatory and exculpatory evidence.
Midwestern University will review evidence gathered during the investigation for relevance and will comply with the applicable protections for privileged information and treatment records; the University's relevance determinations will not diminish a party's right to inspect and review evidence directly related to the allegations, including evidence on which the University does not intend to rely.
Midwestern University will provide each party and the party's advisor, if any, an equal opportunity to inspect and review evidence directly related to the allegations, whether or not the University intends to rely on it, as follows:
- Preliminary Evidence Review: Before completing the investigative report, the University will send each party and the party's advisor, if any, the evidence directly related to the allegations, in electronic format or hard copy, including evidence the University does not intend to rely upon and both inculpatory and exculpatory evidence. The parties will have at least 10 days to submit a written response, which the investigator will consider before completing the report. The same evidence will be available for reference at the hearing, including during cross-examination.
- Final Report Review: The investigator will synthesize the evidence into a written investigative report that fairly summarizes relevant evidence. This final report will be sent to each party and their advisor at least 10 days prior to the live hearing for their review and written response.
Questioning the Parties and Witnesses:
At the required live hearing, the decisionmaker will permit each party's advisor to ask the other party and witnesses all relevant questions and follow-up questions, including credibility questions, directly, orally, and in real time. The decisionmaker may also ask relevant questions, but may not substitute decisionmaker-only questioning for the cross-examination that must be permitted through each party's advisor. See 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(6)(i).
- Each party's advisor, rather than the party personally, conducts cross-examination. If a party has no advisor present at the live hearing, the University will provide an advisor of its choice, without fee or charge, to conduct cross-examination on that party's behalf. The advisor may, but need not, be an attorney.
Procedures for the hearing officer or decisionmaker to evaluate questions:
Before a complainant, respondent, or witness answers a cross-examination or other question, the decisionmaker will determine whether the question is relevant and explain any exclusion as not relevant. Questions and evidence about the complainant's sexual predisposition or prior sexual behavior are subject to the specific limitations stated above. The decisionmaker may impose equally applicable, reasonable rules for orderly questioning, including requesting clarification of unclear questions, without preventing the required relevant cross-examination.
Refusal to respond to questions and inferences based on refusal to respond to questions:
A party's or witness's refusal to answer questions does not categorically bar the decisionmaker from considering statements that person made during the investigation. The decisionmaker will evaluate the available evidence for relevance, credibility, reliability, and weight under consistent, impartial standards. No predetermined evidentiary weight will attach solely because a person did not answer a particular question. See 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(6)(i), as recodified effective September 29, 2026.
Procedures for a live hearing:
Midwestern University may conduct the live hearing with participants physically present in the same location or, at the University's discretion, with some or all parties, witnesses, and other participants appearing virtually using technology that enables simultaneous sight and sound. At either party's request, the University must provide a hearing with the parties in separate rooms using technology that allows the decisionmaker and parties to see and hear the person answering questions. See 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(6)(i).
Midwestern University will create an audio or audiovisual recording or transcript of any live hearing and make it available to the parties for inspection and review.
Written Determination Requirements:
Following the live hearing, the decision-maker will evaluate all relevant evidence to determine responsibility.
- Apply the University's preponderance-of-the-evidence standard consistently to all formal Title IX sexual harassment complaints, including complaints involving faculty, employees, or students. Responsibility may be found only when the decisionmaker concludes that the relevant evidence establishes that a policy violation is more likely than not.
- Provide the parties simultaneously with a written determination regarding responsibility that includes each of the following:
- Identification of the allegations potentially constituting sexual harassment as defined in 34 C.F.R. § 106.30;
- A description of the procedural steps taken from receipt of the formal complaint through the determination, including notices, interviews, site visits, methods used to gather evidence, and hearings held;
- Findings of fact supporting the determination;
- Conclusions regarding the application of the University's applicable code of conduct to the facts;
- A statement of the result and rationale for each allegation, including the determination regarding responsibility, any disciplinary sanctions imposed on the respondent, and whether remedies designed to restore or preserve equal access to the University's education program or activity will be provided to the complainant; and
- The University's procedures and permissible bases for either party to appeal. The Title IX Coordinator is responsible for the effective implementation of any remedies.
Sanctions will be administered under the applicable Student Judicial System or Human Resources procedures, consistent with the written Title IX responsibility determination and the authority of the designated institutional officer. The Title IX Coordinator will maintain the required grievance-process records. In matters involving an employee, Human Resources may receive relevant information necessary to implement authorized employment actions, subject to applicable privacy and records requirements. Academic Deans and Human Resources do not replace the independent Title IX decisionmaker or the University's duty to provide the written determination simultaneously to both parties.
The University will issue the required written responsibility determination simultaneously to the complainant and respondent, including any disciplinary sanctions determined at that stage and whether remedies will be provided. Subsequent administrative communications concerning implementation of sanctions may be issued by the appropriate Academic Dean or Human Resources officer but shall not delay, replace, or contradict the required simultaneous written determination.
The Vice President for Human Resources may separately notify an employee respondent regarding implementation of employment sanctions, consistent with the responsibility determination. Any separate implementation communication does not replace the simultaneous determination issued to both parties. Midwestern University will conclude investigations and hearings within reasonably prompt timeframes, subject to documented, good-cause extensions under these procedures.
The determination regarding responsibility becomes final either on the date that Midwestern University provides the parties with the written determination of the result of any appeal, or, if no party appeals, the date on which an appeal would no longer be considered timely.
Appeal Process:
Both complainant and respondent may appeal a determination of responsibility or dismissal of a formal complaint or allegation to the Provost within 10 business days after simultaneous issuance of the written determination or dismissal notice. An appeal must identify one or more permissible bases below and the reasons supporting the appeal. The appeal decisionmaker must be impartial and separate from the responsibility or dismissal decisionmaker, investigator, and Title IX Coordinator. The University will resolve appeals within the reasonably prompt timeframe stated above, subject to written notice of any good-cause extension.
- Procedural irregularity that affected the outcome of the matter;
- New evidence that was not reasonably available at the time the determination regarding responsibility or dismissal was made and that could affect the outcome of the matter; and
- The Title IX Coordinator, investigator(s), or decisionmaker(s) had a conflict of interest or bias for or against complainants or respondents generally or the individual complainant or respondent that affected the outcome of the matter.
The Provost, acting as the independent appellate decisionmaker, will review the relevant record and any written statements submitted by the parties and issue a written decision stating the result and rationale. Where appropriate, the Provost may affirm, modify, or remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with applicable procedures. If the Provost has a conflict or prohibited prior role, the University will appoint another qualified and impartial appeal decisionmaker.
If a party appeals a dismissal or determination whether sexual harassment occurred, Midwestern University will:
- Notify the other party in writing when an appeal is filed and implement appeal procedures equally for both parties;
- Implement appeal procedures equally for the parties;
- Ensure that the appellate decisionmaker is not the same person as the decisionmaker who reached the responsibility determination or dismissal, any investigator, or the Title IX Coordinator;
- Ensure that the decision-maker for the appeal has been trained pursuant to Title IX regulations;
- Give both parties a reasonable and equal opportunity to submit a written statement in support of, or challenging, the outcome; and
- Issue a written appeal decision describing the result and rationale and provide that decision simultaneously to both parties.
Any additional procedures or bases for appeal Midwestern University offers will be equally available to all parties.
The final decision rests with the Provost or a qualified, impartial alternate appellate decisionmaker when required. Copies of the written appeal decision will be provided simultaneously to the parties and maintained by the Title IX Coordinator; employment or academic sanctions will be implemented by the relevant institutional office consistent with the final decision.
Recordkeeping in Conduct Matters:
Records of Title IX proceedings and institutional responses will be maintained consistently with 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(10) and the University's applicable records-retention requirements, including the following:
- All records related to disciplinary investigations/actions against students are managed by the Office of the Title IX Coordinator (Dean of Students).
- The University will maintain for at least seven years records of each Title IX sexual harassment investigation, responsibility determination, hearing recording or transcript, disciplinary sanctions and remedies, appeals and results, informal resolutions and results, and all materials used to train Title IX Coordinators, investigators, decisionmakers, and informal-resolution facilitators. The University may retain disciplinary records for a longer period under its records-retention policy. Required training materials will be publicly available on the University's website or otherwise made available as required by 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(10).
- A student may see any and all records related to their disciplinary investigation/action/appeal in accordance with the college regulations concerning inspection of records as spelled out in Guidelines for Access to and Disclosure of Educational Records Maintained by Midwestern University.
- The University will provide parties notices of outcomes and access to records to the extent required by Title IX, FERPA, the Clery Act, and other applicable law. For each report or formal complaint of Title IX sexual harassment, the University will also maintain for at least seven years documentation of the actions taken, including supportive measures, and the basis for its conclusion that its response was not deliberately indifferent, as required by 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(10)(ii).
Procedures for Reporting a Sexual Assault on Campus
Any student who is involved in or witnesses a sexual assault should contact Campus Security immediately (Glendale dial 623/572-3201; Downers Grove, dial 630/515-7111). Students have the option to notify law enforcement authorities, including local police, and the option to be assisted by campus authorities in notifying such authorities.
It is extremely important to preserve any evidence related to the crime as may be necessary to provide proof of the assault. The complainant should not bathe or shower, use the restroom, change clothes, comb their hair, clean up the crime scene or move or touch anything that the respondent may have touched. If Campus Security is contacted in an emergency, they will notify the police and the Title IX Coordinator. The Manager of Residence Life will also be notified if emergencies occur within campus housing.
The following is a list of emergency campus telephone numbers:
| Location | Phone Number |
| Glendale Campus | |
| Security | 623/572-3201 |
| Police | 911 |
| Resident Assistant on Duty | 480/258-3247 |
| Dean of Students | 623/572-3210 |
| Downers Grove Campus | |
| Security | 630/515-7111 |
| Police | 911 |
| Resident Assistant on Duty | 480/515-7111 |
| Dean of Students | 630/515-6470 |
Supportive Measures
Midwestern University will offer and coordinate supportive measures as appropriate for the complainant and/or respondent to restore or preserve that person’s access to the Midwestern University’s education program or activity or provide support during Midwestern University’s Title IX grievance procedures or during the resolution process.
The University has counseling services for students who are complainants of or have witnessed an act of sexual harassment, attempted sexual assault, sexual abuse, dating violence, domestic violence or stalking), as well as for those who have been accused of wrongdoing. Student complainants/respondents of an alleged act of sexual harassment have options for requesting a change in academic situations and on-campus residence arrangements if such requests are reasonable and available. In addition to seeking assistance from the Title IX Coordinator, students may also seek assistance from the following University personnel or outside resources:
| In Arizona: | |
| University Personnel | |
| Title IX Coordinator – Dr. Shannon Sesterhenn | 623/572-3357 |
| Manager of Residence Life | 623/572-3848 |
| Deputy Title IX Coordinator – Dr. Shawn Tennant | 623/572-3366 |
| Assistant Title IX Coordinator – Julie High Horse | 623/572-3213 |
| Office of Student Services | 623/572-3210 |
| Student Counselor | 623/572-3740 |
| Community Resources | |
| Glendale Police Victim Assistance Hotline | 623/930-3000 |
| Domestic Violence Hotline | 1-800-799-7233 |
| Maricopa Crisis Hotline | 1-800-631-1314 |
| In Illinois: | |
| University Personnel | |
| Title IX Coordinator Dr. Megan Dallianis | 630/971-6088 |
| Manager of Residence Life | 630/971-6400 |
| Assistant Title IX Coordinator – Dr. Lori Vozari | 630/515-6474 |
| Student Counselor | 630/515-7142 |
| Community Resources | |
| Family Shelter Service | 630/469-5650 |
| Mutual Ground | 630/897-8383 |
| Northwest CASA | 888-802-8890 |
| YWCA Metropolitan Chicago | 888-283-2080 |
| YWCA (South Suburban) | 708/748-5672 |
| YWCA West Suburban Center | 630-790-6600 |
| Domestic Violence Hotline | 800-799-7233 |
| DuPage County Crisis Line | 630-627-1700 |
Sexual Harassment Education and Awareness
Midwestern University provides educational programming that consists of primary prevention and awareness programs for all incoming students and new employees and ongoing awareness and prevention campaigns for students, faculty, and staff that:
- Identify sexual misconduct which includes sexual harassment, sexual abuse, sexual assault or rape, domestic violence, dating violence and stalking as prohibited conduct;
- Defines what behavior constitutes sexual harassment, sexual abuse, sexual assault or rape, domestic violence, dating violence and stalking;
- Defines ‘consent to sexual activity’ under University policy and state regulations;
- Covers information on reporting sexual violence, assisting victims and survivors of sexual violence, and preventing sexual violence through bystander training; and
- Explains rights of the complainant and respondent, including the right to file reports with external law enforcement agencies and the right to an advisor.
All employees and students of Midwestern University are required to complete and pass online courses through Vector Solutions LMS regarding related topics on Sexual Assault and Prevention; Harassment and Discrimination; and Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging. In addition, all Midwestern University students sign an agreement that they are responsible for the policies outlined in the Student Handbook, including its sections on the Code of Conduct and Sexual Misconduct-Title IX Violations policy.